We may earn a commission from operator links. This never affects our ratings.
BTC$75,240ETH$2,315USDT$1.00SOL$85LTC$84DOGE$0.16BTC$75,240ETH$2,315USDT$1.00SOL$85LTC$84DOGE$0.16
Daily insightsLatest newsBest for slotsNo-KYC casinosWithdrawal Confidence IndexOn-chain reservesAll promo codes
Home/On-chain
Crypto casino reserves, ranked

Crypto casinos with the deepest on-chain reserves

Snapshot 2026-05-28 at 05:54 UTC. Source: Arkham Intelligence.

Combined clustered liquidity
$564.90M
across 11 indexed operators
Operators tracked
11 of 24
clustered on Arkham Intelligence
Top operator share
60%
held by Stake.com

At a glance

Aggregate scale across every operator we have clustered. Single snapshot, weekly cadence, source noted at the foot of every figure.

Combined tagged reserves
$564.90M
Across the 11 operators Arkham has clustered.
Indexed operators
11 of 24 reviewed
Hot and cold wallets clustered under a single entity tag.
Week over week
+$15.92M +2.90%
Aggregate net flow across all clustered operators since last snapshot.
Tracked addresses
15.7M
Hot, cold, and operational wallets aggregated across indexed operators.

Biggest movers this week

Calculated week over week on the 11 operators we index. Clustered wallets only, so the figures move with operator flows and token prices between snapshots.

Operators with clustered on-chain reserves

Full ranking of every operator we cover, indexed or not. Click a name for the per-operator page with chain split, asset composition, and our written read on the number.

OperatorTagged reserves7d change5-week trendAddresses$ / addressFull review
Stake.com$339.53M+2.7%7.9M$43Review
Rollbit$96.68M+2.3%352K$274Review
Rainbet.com$60.82M+27.6%377K$161Review
Betfury$24.46M-4.1%200K$122Review
BC.Game$23.57M-12.3%1.6M$15Review
Roobet.com$11.59M-24.1%3.2M$4Review
Cloudbet$5.31M-1.1%161K$33Review
1xBet$2.17M-3.4%1.4M$2Review
Gamdom.com$625.5K-1.8%183K$3Review
Phenom Poker$83.8K-33.0%96$873Review
FortuneJack$56.7K-4.3%357K$0Review

Operators without a public wallet cluster

These operators are not currently clustered by Arkham Intelligence, so no third-party on-chain figure is available. Absence of a cluster is not evidence against the operator. It means reserves cannot be independently verified through public wallet data.

OperatorStatusFull review
Razed.comNot clustered by ArkhamReview
Betplay.ioNot clustered by ArkhamReview
Duel.comNot clustered by ArkhamReview
Stake.usNot clustered by ArkhamReview
JackNot clustered by ArkhamReview
Sportsbet.ioNot clustered by ArkhamReview
BitkingzNot clustered by ArkhamReview
1winNot clustered by ArkhamReview
ZunaBetNot clustered by ArkhamReview
HousebetsNot clustered by ArkhamReview
DegencityNot clustered by ArkhamReview
betskiNot clustered by ArkhamReview
LegendzNot clustered by ArkhamReview

Wider crypto-gambling landscape, for reference

These operators are clustered by Arkham but are not on the Cryptotips review list. We have not deposit-tested any of them, so the numbers below carry the Arkham figure only, with no payout test, no licence read, and no WCI score. Reference data for context, not a recommendation.

OperatorTagged reservesTop chainTop asset
Rollbit$96.68MEthereumRLB
BetFury$24.46MBNB ChainBFG
Cloudbet$5.31MSolanaUSDT
Phenom Poker$83.8KPolygonUSDT0
FortuneJack$56.7KDogecoinDOGE
Bitstarz$5.2KBitcoinBTC
500 Casino$3.4KBNB ChainBSC-USD

Crypto trading platforms, for scale

Decentralised perp DEXs, prediction markets, and one Solana aggregator. Different product to a casino, same Arkham clustering, included to show how the scale compares. Hyperliquid alone holds more on-chain than every casino on this page combined, and the nine venues below clear the entire reviewed pile by 15.7 times. Reserves figures are vault and protocol liquidity, not house balances, and these venues do not appear on the Cryptotips review list.

PlatformTagged reservesTop chainTop assetType
Hyperliquid$4.02BArbitrumUSDCPerp DEX, vault liquidity provider model
Jupiter$3.17BSolanaJUPSolana DEX aggregator
Polymarket$821.17MPolygonUSDC.EPrediction market on Polygon
GMX$275.37MArbitrumUSDCDecentralised perpetuals exchange
Drift Protocol$252.65MSolanaSOLSolana perpetuals DEX
dYdX$160.82MEthereumETHDYDXCosmos-based perpetuals exchange
Apex Exchange$111.56MEthereumAPEXLayer-2 perp DEX
Aevo$40.63MEthereumRBNOptions and perps L2
Paradex$37.00MEthereumUSDCStarknet-based perp DEX

Key observations

Stablecoin share
0.0%
of combined reserves held in USDT, USDC, DAI, and BSC-USD. Read as operator hedging of player balances against crypto volatility.
Ethereum concentration
0.0%
of combined reserves on Ethereum. High share reflects deep stablecoin and ETH liquidity, and higher gas costs for each withdrawal.
Operator concentration
60%
held by the single largest operator. The market is highly concentrated at the top, with a long tail of mid-sized operators behind.

Reading the numbers

Summary. 11 of the 24 operators Cryptotips covers have their hot and cold wallets clustered under entity tags on Arkham Intelligence. Combined on-chain reserves for those 11 stand at $564.90M as of 2026-05-28. Stake.com alone accounts for 60 percent of the total, with $339.53M across 7.9M tracked addresses. The remaining 10 operators share the balance, each with a distinct liquidity profile.

What the spread tells you. Absolute reserves are a scale signal, not a trust signal. Phenom Poker runs the highest dollar-per-tracked-address depth at $873, which reads as concentrated high-balance players. FortuneJack runs the thinnest at $0 per address, consistent with a broad retail base and off-chain operational float. Neither figure is inherently better or worse. Both shape how quickly an operator can absorb a withdrawal spike, and both are one input among payout tests, licensing, and dispute history.

Limits of the data. These figures measure publicly clustered on-chain holdings only. Operators hold additional funds in fiat accounts, prime brokerage accounts, and wallets that Arkham has not clustered. A low tagged balance is not evidence an operator is undercapitalised. A high tagged balance is not a solvency guarantee. The number is a floor, not a ceiling, and the composition of that floor, meaning the chain split and asset mix, often matters more than the top-line total.

Cadence. Snapshots are manual. We refresh on a weekly cycle and note the exact UTC time each reading was taken. Between snapshots, figures on intel.arkm.com move in real time with chain prices and flows. Use the per-operator pages for chain split, asset composition, and the written interpretation of each number.

Method and refresh cadence

We read the logged-out entity pages on intel.arkm.com, pulled the current total, the chain split, and the top assets, and wrote them down with a timestamp. That is the entire method. We do not run our own indexer, and we do not hold any wallet private keys from operators. The reading is what any reader can replicate in ten minutes.

What counts as indexed. An operator is listed as indexed only if Arkham has published an entity cluster that combines hot and cold wallets under a single label. Untagged transit wallets and single addresses do not count. If an operator is not indexed, we say so, and we link to payout tests and licensing records as alternative verification routes.

Refresh cadence. Snapshots are manual and scheduled weekly. Each brand page carries a timestamp in UTC. Between snapshots, the Arkham figure on intel.arkm.com will move with market prices and on-chain flows. We do not interpolate.

Further reading. For context on why on-chain reserves are a useful signal but not a complete one, read provably fair, explained and the methodology page.