Snapshot: 2026-04-21 at 16:37 UTC · Source: Arkham Intelligence
Five of the eight operators we cover have their hot and cold wallets tagged and clustered by Arkham Intelligence. Three do not. Below is the snapshot. The numbers are public, the addresses are public, and the caveats are in every cell.
These are reserves, not solvency. A tagged balance is a floor, a missing cluster is not a verdict. Read this table next to the review, not instead of it.
| Operator | Tagged reserves | Addresses | $ / address | Full review |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stake | $351.24M | 7.6M | $46 | Review |
| Rainbet | $52.99M | 330K | $161 | Review |
| BC.Game | $26.89M | 1.6M | $17 | Review |
| Roobet | $12.38M | 3.2M | $4 | Review |
| Gamdom | $649.2K | 183K | $4 | Review |
No third-party on-chain verification available. That is not an allegation, it is an absence. Weight the other inputs accordingly.
| Operator | Status | Full review |
|---|---|---|
| Razed | Not clustered by Arkham | Review |
| Betplay | Not clustered by Arkham | Review |
| Duel | Not clustered by Arkham | Review |
We read the logged-out entity pages on intel.arkm.com, pulled the current total, the chain split, and the top assets, and wrote them down with a timestamp. That is the entire method. When the paid API key is wired, this table refreshes hourly and we keep a changelog.
For context on why on-chain reserves are a useful signal but not a complete one, read provably fair, explained and the methodology page.