We may earn a commission from operator links. This never affects our ratings.
BTC$75,240ETH$2,315USDT$1.00SOL$85LTC$84DOGE$0.16BTC$75,240ETH$2,315USDT$1.00SOL$85LTC$84DOGE$0.16
Home/Corrections
We were wrong

Corrections

Every affiliate site claims to be honest. Most prove it by quietly editing the page and hoping no one screenshotted the old version. This is the page where we list the bad calls, what changed, and why. If you find one we missed, the contact link is at the foot of the page.

2026-04-18

BC.Game rated above Rainbet in March. April withdrawal test flipped that.

What we said

In the March 2026 ranking, BC.Game sat at position three with an 8.4 score. Rainbet sat at four with 8.2.

What we got wrong

We weighted reserve size too heavily and discounted Rainbet's faster median payout. When we ran a fresh deposit-and-withdraw test in April, Rainbet returned funds in six minutes against BC.Game's twelve. Two pulls, same wallet, no support ticket needed on either side.

What we changed

Rainbet moved to position three, BC.Game to position four. The new WCI weights payout history at 25%, which closes the gap that the old methodology was hiding.

2026-04-02

Roobet promo code MAXBONUS displayed as NEWBONUS site-wide.

What we said

The Roobet review and promo page showed the universal NEWBONUS code for two weeks in late March.

What we got wrong

Roobet's affiliate program uses a different code from the rest of our roster. We had a global default and forgot Roobet was an exception. Anyone who used the wrong code got the standard welcome instead of the better matched-deposit offer.

What we changed

Roobet now hard-codes MAXBONUS everywhere. We added a unit test that flags any future drift between data.json promo codes and what renders on the page.

2026-03-21

Duel.com referred to as Duelbits across the live blog.

What we said

A 2026 news roundup repeatedly called the operator Duelbits when describing recent product updates.

What we got wrong

Duelbits was retired as a brand in 2024. The current operator is Duel.com, owned by the same parent, with a different licence and a different wallet cluster. Calling it Duelbits in 2026 is a year out of date and confuses a reader who tries to reconcile our on-chain numbers with the legacy wallet.

What we changed

All references corrected to Duel.com. The legacy Duelbits wallet is kept in the registry as a non-active cluster so the trail is still readable.

2026-02-14

Stake.US rated 9.1 in January. Now 8.6.

What we said

January's first pass at Stake.US gave it a 9.1 and a top-three position in the sweepstakes category.

What we got wrong

We rated the casino product without testing redemption end-to-end. A reader pointed out that the median time from sweeps coin redemption to bank credit was running over twenty-four hours, which is slow even by sweepstakes standards. We had not measured it.

What we changed

Score dropped to 8.6. WCI added a payout component that captures the slow redemption rather than burying it. Sweepstakes are now scored on a separate licence track so they do not get a free ride against a real-money operator.

2026-01-12

Gamdom listed as 'top reserves' in a 2026 hub page. They were not.

What we said

A January hub page on best crypto casinos referenced Gamdom's reserve size as evidence of operator strength.

What we got wrong

Gamdom's on-chain reserves had already dropped sharply by late 2025. We pulled the line from a 2024 draft and republished it without checking the current number. By the time the page went live, Gamdom's indexed reserves were under a million dollars.

What we changed

Reserve language now pulls live from wallet_registry.json instead of being written into the copy. The hub page was rewritten the same week.