Same brands, same weights, two different answers. The numbers below are deposit-tested and the scores recompute every build.
| Spec | Gamdom | 1xBet |
|---|---|---|
| WCI score | 70 (Adequate) | 62 (Adequate) |
| Tier | A | B |
| Overall rating | 8.3/10 | 7.4/10 |
| Welcome bonus | 15% rakeback, weekly races | $130 + free bet |
| Promo code | newbonus | NEWBONUS |
| Cryptos accepted | 11 | 15 |
| Min deposit | $1 equivalent crypto | $1 equivalent in crypto |
| Withdrawal speed | Under 5 minutes typical on-chain | 15 minutes to 7 days, depends on method and KYC state |
| Licence | Curaçao Gaming Authority (OGL/2023/981/0450) | Curacao eGaming (8048/JAZ), operated through 1XCorp N.V. |
| Year founded | 2016 | 2007 |
| Game count | 6,500+ | 7,000+ |
| Live streaming | No | Yes |
| Component | Gamdom | 1xBet |
|---|---|---|
| Reserves (30%) | 29 | 39 |
| Payout (25%) | 85 | 85 |
| Age and history (20%) | 100 | 60 |
| Licence (15%) | 70 | 70 |
| Trend (10%) | 95 | 65 |
Take Gamdom as the default. WCI 70 against 62 is inside the margin where either operator is defensible, but the higher score is the higher score. Take 1xBet if you specifically want Massive market depth, Curacao licence, long history of regulator complaints. Bet here with eyes open. and you have read the trade-off in 1xBet's review. Both pay out. Both were deposit-tested by us this quarter.
